Performance measurement asks: how are we performing?
Tracking KPIs such as revenue, margins, productivity or staffing levels helps organisations understand their own development over time.
Help participants understand how they perform compared to relevant peers and identify opportunities for improvement.
Performance benchmarking turns operational, financial or strategic data into meaningful comparisons, dashboards and benchmark reports.
Performance benchmarking helps participants understand where they perform well, where improvement is possible and how they compare to relevant peers.
Tracking KPIs such as revenue, margins, productivity or staffing levels helps organisations understand their own development over time.
By comparing the same measures with relevant peers, reference groups or previous periods, organisations can identify differences, trends and opportunities for improvement.
A KPI may reveal a performance gap, but additional analysis is often needed to understand the underlying causes. Operational data, process reviews or qualitative research can help explain differences.
Measure. Compare. Analyse. Then decide what the difference means.
The focus of a benchmark depends on the sector, research question and decisions participants need to support.
Typical benchmark categories include:
Compare financial performance across participants using metrics such as revenue, profitability, margins and cost structures.
Analyse how efficiently resources are used through measures such as revenue per FTE, utilisation rates and productivity ratios.
Compare operational KPIs such as volumes, efficiency, cycle times and service delivery performance.
Benchmark workforce-related measures including staffing levels, employee turnover and absence rates.
Include customer, quality or outcome indicators to provide additional context alongside financial and operational performance measures.
Participants should measure the same thing in the same way. Otherwise, differences may reflect interpretation rather than performance.
Validation helps identify incomplete, inconsistent or unusual submissions before results are compared.
Not every participant should be compared with every other participant. Meaningful comparisons depend on selecting peers with relevant characteristics such as size, sector or business model.
Raw numbers often reflect size rather than performance. Ratios and relative measures can make comparisons more meaningful.
Participants should understand what they are being compared with and how results should be interpreted.
Help members understand their performance while building valuable industry insight for the association.
Performance Benchmarking for Trade AssociationsCompare locations, franchises or network members and identify opportunities for improvement through meaningful performance comparisons.
Performance Benchmarking for Franchise & NetworksSupport client discussions with objective benchmark data and scale a consistent benchmarking methodology across engagements.
Performance Benchmarking for Consultants & AdvisorsThe Survey Tool automates data collection, validation, calculations and individual and market reporting.
Compare to Compete combines a configurable platform with practical benchmarking experience to support both the technical and methodological aspects of a benchmark programme.
Since 2011, NOAB and later Fiscount have used a shared benchmarking programme to provide participating firms with individual benchmark reports and sector-wide insight. Approximately 25% of member firms participate in a typical round.
Read about NOAB & Fiscount →SRA uses recurring benchmarking and organisation cultural research programmes to provide member firms with comparative insight and long-term trend analysis.
Read about SRA →Performance benchmarking is the systematic comparison of standardised performance measures or KPIs with relevant peers, groups, previous periods or other reference points. It adds external or comparative context to ordinary performance measurement.
A KPI is a measure of performance. A benchmark is a reference against which that measure is compared. The same KPI can therefore be compared with several benchmark groups or reference points.
No. Different reference groups can be appropriate when characteristics such as size, type, region or business model materially affect the comparison. The research design should determine which groups are relevant.
Start with common definitions and calculation rules. Where appropriate, normalise measures using a meaningful denominator such as FTE, revenue, transactions or another unit. Then validate the submitted data before comparing results.
Why peer selection can change the meaning of a benchmark.
Read guide →How different group statistics answer different questions.
Read guide →How definitions and calculation rules prevent false comparisons.
Read guide →Why a performance gap is the start of analysis, not the conclusion.
Read guide →Tell us who participates, what should be measured and what participants should receive in return. We'll help define the benchmark structure, reporting approach and supporting technology.
Start with comparability. Then build the benchmark.
Discuss your research question