Create value on two levels
Design the programme around what the association needs to know and what members should receive in return for their data.
Help members understand their own performance while building valuable insight into the industry as a whole.
From benchmarking and market monitoring to remuneration research and member studies, trade associations can transform recurring research into a valuable member service.
Design the programme around what the association needs to know and what members should receive in return for their data.
The research design should reflect your objectives, participant value, confidentiality requirements and available capacity.
Members may be asked to provide commercially sensitive information.
Participation therefore depends on:
Trust is not a technical feature. It is a design requirement.
Run the research independently, divide tasks with C2C or ask us to operate more of the recurring process.
Associations need information about their industry. Members need a reason to participate.
The most successful research programmes deliver value to both.
The association gains insight into developments, trends and member needs.
Members receive information that helps them understand their own organisation.
The stronger the participant value, the easier it becomes to build long-term participation.
Recurring research becomes more valuable when the methodology remains consistent over time.
Instead of rebuilding questionnaires, calculations and reports for every cycle, the programme can evolve while retaining comparability.
This creates reliable trend information for both the association and participating members.
The right programme starts with the question the association and its members need answered. These are common applications.
Compare member performance using relevant peer groups and provide participating organisations with meaningful benchmarks.
Typical outputs
Track market developments and provide members with context for their own performance.
Typical outputs
Help members benchmark salaries, benefits and employment conditions.
Typical outputs
Understand member satisfaction, needs and priorities.
Typical outputs
A successful programme involves more than collecting responses.
The value is created by validating, analysing, comparing and reporting information in a way that is useful to both the association and participating members.
The Compare to Compete Survey Tool supports that complete process:
The programme should strengthen your relationship with members.
Questionnaires, dashboards and reports can be fully aligned with your branding, terminology and communication style.
Your association remains the visible owner of the programme.
Not every association has the same research expertise, capacity or internal resources. The collaboration can therefore be organised at different levels.
Your team manages the research programme and uses the platform for data collection, validation, benchmarking, dashboards, reporting and participant workflows.
Combine your association's knowledge of the industry and members with our experience in benchmarking, research design and the Survey Tool.
Where required, Compare to Compete can support more of the process, such as research setup, configuration, analysis and reporting. The exact division of responsibilities is agreed for the programme.
Annual benchmarking programme providing participating firms with individual performance insight and sector-wide benchmarking.
Portfolio of recurring benchmarking and research programmes covering performance, remuneration, IT, culture and employee satisfaction.
Purchasing benchmarks that help members compare energy procurement results while supporting advocacy and communication activities.
Members can receive different types of feedback depending on the research programme. This may include benchmark reports, peer-group comparisons, salary comparisons, market insights, trend analyses or other participant-specific results.
Participation increases when members receive information they can use themselves. Benchmark reports, market comparisons and other relevant feedback often provide a stronger reason to participate than contributing to an industry report alone.
Yes. Access rights, reporting rules and confidentiality arrangements can be configured for each programme. Individual participant information can remain confidential while aggregated results are used for association reporting and industry insight.
No. Some associations manage the programme independently, others share responsibilities with Compare to Compete, and some choose broader operational support. The division of responsibilities can be adapted to your expertise, capacity and preferences.
Common programmes include:
The right approach depends on the question the association wants to answer.
Yes. Most benchmarking and research programmes become more valuable over time because trends and developments can be tracked consistently. The Survey Tool supports recurring data collection, reporting and historical comparisons.
Tell us:
We'll help identify the right research approach.
Discuss your research question